top of page

Alexander's Unusual Loyalties

TITLE

‘Alexander always treated his friends and allies badly, and his enemies well.’ Explain how far you agree with this statement.

ESSAY

🌟Essay: Alexander's Treatment of Friends, Allies, and Enemies🌟

🌟Introduction🌟
Alexander the Great is known for his conquests and the vast empire he built, but his treatment of friends, allies, and enemies has been a subject of debate. Some argue that he always treated his friends and allies badly, while treating his enemies well. In this essay, we will analyze the different ways in which Alexander treated those around him, and discuss the extent to which the statement holds true.

🌟Treatment of Friends and Allies🌟
💥 Dismissal of the Athenian fleet despite their early service against Persia
💥 Implementation of the Policy of Fusion that alienated Greek friends and allies
💥 Controversial incidents such as the murder of Cleitus the Black and the execution of Callisthenes, Philotas, and Parmenio
💥 Replacement of Macedonian troops with Persians and insistence on marriages to Persian women

🌟Contradictory Instances🌟
💥 Hephaestion, a close friend of Alexander, was always treated well
💥 Many friends like Ptolemy and Seleucus commanded troops and inherited his empire
💥 Overall good treatment of his men, rewarding their efforts and sending them home as a reward
💥 Gestures such as sending armor to Athens and restoring exiles showcase positive treatment

🌟Treatment of Enemies🌟
💥 Respectful treatment of Darius, providing him a royal funeral and punishing his killers
💥 Consideration for Darius' family and retention of Persian governors
💥 Policy of Fusion, inclusion of Persian soldiers, and marriages to enemy women like Roxane and Barsine

🌟Inconsistencies in Treatment of Enemies🌟
💥 Instances of ruthless actions like the destruction of Thebes, enslavement of Greek mercenaries, and harsh treatment of populations like at Gaza and Persepolis

🌟Evaluation🌟
Alexander's treatment of individuals, whether friends, allies, or enemies, was influenced by their loyalty or perceived opposition. While he rewarded loyalty and integrated different cultures in his empire, he also resorted to brutal actions against those who opposed him. The Policy of Fusion and strategic treatment of enemies were pragmatic decisions that contributed to his success.

🌟Conclusion🌟
In conclusion, Alexander's treatment of his friends, allies, and enemies varied based on circumstances and individuals' actions. While he displayed acts of goodwill and generosity towards some, he also resorted to cruelty and ruthlessness in dealing with opposition. The statement that Alexander always treated his friends and allies badly, and his enemies well, does not capture the complexity and nuances of his actions, which were influenced by a myriad of factors.

SUBJECT

CLASSICCAL STUDIES

LEVEL

A level and AS level

NOTES

🌟Alexander’s Treatment of Friends and Allies and Enemies🌟

Alexander always treated his friends and allies badly, and his enemies well.' Explain how far you agree with this statement. Alexander treated both friends and enemies in a variety of ways, which changed over time.

🌟Friends and Allies:🌟

💥 Alexander dismissed the Athenian fleet despite its great service in the early campaigns against Persia.
💥 Alexander’s Policy of Fusion alienated many of his friends and allies amongst the Greeks.
💥 He murdered Cleitus the Black.
💥 Callisthenes was executed as were Philotas and Parmenio.
💥 He dismissed Macedonian troops, replacing them with Persians.
💥 He forced his men to marry Persian wives.

🌟But:🌟

💥 Hephaestion was always treated well, including his lavish funeral.
💥 Many of his friends, such as Ptolemy and Seleucus, commanded his troops and inherited his empire.
💥 He always treated his men well, rewarding them for their efforts.
💥 Even sending his men home could be seen as treating them well – a reward for their service.
💥 He sent 300 suits of armour and the statues of the Tyrannicides to Athens.
💥 Restoration of the exiles.

🌟Enemies:🌟

💥 Alexander treated Darius well, giving him a royal funeral and punishing his killers.
💥 He treated Darius’ family as his own.
💥 He kept Persian governors in their positions.
💥 His Policy of Fusion made him more a Persian than a Macedonian king.
💥 He brought Persian soldiers into his army.
💥 He married enemy women, such as Roxane and Barsine.
💥 He restored Porus to his kingdom after defeating him.

🌟But:🌟

💥 Destruction of Thebes.
💥 Enslavement of Greek mercenaries after Granicus.
💥 Treatment of the population of Gaza.
💥 Burning of the palace of Persepolis.

Alexander’s treatment of people depended on their attitude to him. He rewarded loyalty and punished those he saw as opposing him. His Policy of Fusion and good treatment of his enemies could be seen as being pragmatic.

🌟What do you think was the most important of Alexander’s achievements?🌟

In your answer, you should consider a range of his achievements. There are many different ideas candidates could consider:

💥 Alexander becoming king in the first place despite the attitude of his father and the other Macedonians.
💥 His military achievements and conquest of a vast empire.
💥 His spreading of Greek culture around the eastern Mediterranean.
💥 His building of a large number of cities all around the areas he controlled.
💥 His attempted fusion of differing cultures.
💥 His legacy and reputation which persists to this very day.
Candidates should consider a variety of achievements and give evidence to support their argument.

bottom of page