Analyzing Israel's Lack of Gains from the Suez Crisis
TITLE
‘Israel did not benefit from the Suez Crisis.
ESSAY
The Suez Crisis of 1956 was a significant event in the history of the Middle East, with far-reaching implications for the nations involved. An assessment of whether Israel benefited from the crisis must consider both the short-term gains and the long-term consequences of its actions during the conflict.
Militarily, the Suez-Sinai campaign was a resounding success for Israel. Its forces launched a surprise attack against Egypt in the Sinai region, routing the Egyptian army and demonstrating the strength and capability of the Israeli Defence Force. Israel's war aims, such as protecting the port of Eilat and opening the Straits of Tiran for navigation, were achieved. This military victory established Israel as a formidable regional power and bolstered its national security.
Furthermore, the international ramifications of the Suez Crisis were also beneficial for Israel. The conflict brought Israel to the attention of the United States, which began to view it as a Cold War ally in the Middle East. The special relationship between Israel and the U.S. that emerged in the aftermath of the crisis laid the groundwork for continued cooperation and support in the decades that followed. Additionally, Israel's alliance with France was strengthened, leading to continued economic and military support from the European nation.
Israel's prestige among non-aligned countries also increased as it demonstrated its determination to resist external pressures from more powerful neighbors. This newfound international standing allowed Israel to become an important provider of agricultural and military knowledge in the region, further enhancing its influence in the Middle East.
Economically, the prosperity of Israel began to increase as a result of these factors, providing a sense of security and stability for the nation. The political landscape in Israel was also affected by the crisis, with leaders like Ben-Gurion and Moshe Dayan gaining increased influence and support following the victory.
However, it is important to consider the long-term consequences of the Suez Crisis for Israel. Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser emerged as a hero in the Arab world, creating enduring animosity towards Israel and complicating the prospects for peace in the region. The crisis also marked the beginning of social unrest among Palestinians in Israel, foreshadowing the challenges and conflicts that would continue to plague the region in the years to come.
In conclusion, while Israel did experience significant short-term benefits from the Suez Crisis in terms of military success, international recognition, and economic prosperity, the long-term consequences of the conflict cannot be ignored. The enduring tensions with its Arab neighbors and the growing Palestinian-Israeli conflict underscore the complex legacy of the Suez Crisis for Israel.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
A LEVEL
NOTES
"Israel did not benefit from the Suez Crisis."
Assess this view.
Indicative content:
- Militarily, the Suez-Sinai campaign was a great success for Israel – its forces launched a surprise attack against Egypt in the Sinai region, routing its army.
- The strength and capability of the Israeli Defence Force was established.
- Israel’s war aims were met, e.g., the port of Eilat / Straits of Tiran were protected.
- The Straits of Tiran, closed by Egypt to Israeli navigation, were now opened for all.
- The conflict gave Israel, which had only been established for 8 years, international credibility and brought it to the firm attention of the USA which began to see it as a Cold War ally in the Middle East.
- The United States moved more and more in the direction of bilateral relations, mainly with Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Israel.
- The war played a key role in laying the groundwork which led to the special relationship between Israel and the United States that began to emerge in the mid-1960s.
- Israel’s alliance with the French was significantly strengthened by the war. France continued its economic and military support of Israel; this included assisting Israel in its establishment of the nuclear reactor in Dimona.
- Israel’s prestige grew among non-aligned countries as it showed the determination of an independent country to resist ‘bullying’ from more powerful neighbors. Links with the non-aligned movement strengthened.
- Israel became an important provider of agricultural and military knowledge for a large number of countries in the region. The prosperity of Israel began to increase as a result of these factors and Israel had a sense of security for the first time.
- The victory also led to Ben-Gurion and his Mapai Party achieving a victory in the 1959 elections and Moshe Dayan’s influence also increased; his approach was based on the use of force.
- Nasser, the so-called “Muslim Mussolini,” emerged from the crisis as a hero in the Arab world, creating an enduring problem for Israel and, more ominously, Palestinians within Israel began their first stirrings of social unrest.