top of page

Emergence of Chartism in 1838: Socioeconomic Factors Driven by Working-Class Discontent

TITLE

Explain why Chartism emerged in 1838.

ESSAY

Chartism emerged in 1838 as a direct response to the challenging social and political conditions faced by the lower classes in Britain during the 19th century. The Industrial Revolution had led to significant transformations in working and living conditions, with many workers enduring long hours, low wages, and poor living conditions. In order to address these issues and advocate for reforms, it became apparent that the lower classes needed to engage with the political system, particularly with Parliament.

The passage of the Great Reform Act of 1832 raised hopes among the lower classes that political change was possible through organized campaigns and mass mobilization. However, despite the reform, Parliament did not significantly address the concerns of the working class, leading to disillusionment and frustration. This lack of response from Parliament fueled the emergence of Chartism as a more radical and assertive movement seeking political change.

Furthermore, the limitations of Trade Unionism as a means of addressing the grievances of the working class played a role in the rise of Chartism. Government hostility towards unions, as exemplified by the harsh treatment of the Tolpuddle Martyrs in 1834, coupled with low membership numbers and declining union influence during economic downturns, demonstrated the inadequacy of this approach in achieving meaningful reform for the lower classes.

The passage of the Municipal Corporations Act in 1835 further alienated the lower classes from the political process by restricting electoral participation to property owners. This disenfranchisement exacerbated the sense of exclusion and powerlessness felt by the working class, highlighting the need for more substantial political representation and influence.

Moreover, the Anti-Poor Law campaign that arose in 1837–38 underscored the significant control that Parliament had over the daily lives of working people through legislation like the New Poor Law Amendment Act of 1834. The failure to repeal or reform these laws through conventional means of influence highlighted the need for direct political representation and participation by working people in order to bring about meaningful change.

In conclusion, the emergence of Chartism in 1838 was a culmination of various factors including the failure of past reform efforts, the limitations of Trade Unionism, the exclusion of the lower classes from the political process, and the oppressive impact of legislation like the New Poor Law. Through Chartism, the working class sought to assert their demands for political representation, social reform, and improved conditions, marking a significant moment in the history of British radical movements and the struggle for social justice.

SUBJECT

HISTORY

PAPER

AS LEVEL

NOTES

Explain why Chartism emerged in 1838:

- The Industrial Revolution had resulted in profound changes to working and living conditions for the lower classes. To get improvements in these conditions, the lower classes needed to have Parliament take up their cause. They had to influence the political process.
- The Great Reform Act of 1832 seemed to offer hope to the lower classes as it showed what a well-organised campaign (demonstrations, meetings, pamphlets, and newspapers), with the support of large numbers, could achieve. However, the reformed Parliament acted no differently to previous Parliaments and so the concerns of the lower classes were ignored.
- Trade Unionism did not offer a solution because the government, be it Whig or Tory, saw unions as a threat to the social order and acted harshly, e.g., the Tolpuddle Martyrs (1834). Also, membership of unions was low, the Grand National Consolidated Trade Union (GNCTU) only had 16,000 members and during a decline in trade (as in 1836), membership of unions fell.
- The Municipal Corporations Act (1835) further excluded the lower classes from the political process. The votes for town councils were extended to all ratepayers, but to pay rates you needed to own property and few members of the lower classes did so.
- The Anti-Poor Law campaign (1837–38) was formed to reform the New Poor Law Amendment Act (1834). This law showed how much control Parliament had over the daily lives of working people and how little control they had over their own lives. A vote on the repeal of the New Poor Law was defeated 309 votes to 17 votes. Thus, seeking to influence Parliament would not work; change would only come once working people entered Parliament. Accept any other valid responses.

bottom of page