Germany's Power Status by 1929
TITLE
To what extent had Germany regained its position as a major power by 1929?
ESSAY
Title: Germany's Re-emergence as a Major Power by 1929: A Balanced Assessment
Germany's recovery following the devastation of World War I and the harsh terms of the Versailles Treaty is a complex and multifaceted issue. By 1929, the country had made significant strides in regaining its position as a major power, but there were also lingering challenges and obstacles that needed to be considered. This essay will explore the arguments both for and against the extent to which Germany had re-established itself on the world stage by 1929.
One of the key arguments in favor of Germany's recovery was its growing involvement in international negotiations. The Rapallo Pact with Russia in 1922 marked a significant diplomatic achievement for Germany, despite French mistrust. The Dawes Plan of 1924 played a crucial role in stabilizing Germany's economy and paving the way for its economic growth. The Locarno Pact of 1925 and Germany's subsequent admission to the League of Nations in 1926 symbolized a reintegration of Germany into the international community. The Young Plan further demonstrated Germany's improved standing by stabilizing its reparations commitments.
However, there were also valid arguments against Germany's full acceptance as a major power by 1929. French mistrust, exemplified by the Ruhr invasion, persisted despite diplomatic efforts. The eastern border, especially with Poland, remained tense, undermining Germany's security. The terms of the Versailles Treaty continued to weigh heavily on Germany, with its colonies lost and armed forces restricted. The absence of meaningful arms reduction talks and the rise of extremist sentiments further complicated Germany's re-emergence as a major power.
In conclusion, while Germany had indeed made significant strides in recovering from the aftermath of World War I by 1929, there were still notable challenges that limited its full acceptance as a major power. The diplomatic achievements, economic growth, and international reintegration were positive signs, but the unresolved issues of mistrust, territorial tensions, and ongoing grievances highlighted the complexity of Germany's position in the international arena. It is clear that Germany's journey towards regaining its status as a major power was ongoing and multifaceted, with both progress and setbacks shaping its trajectory.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
AS LEVEL
NOTES
To what extent had Germany regained its position as a major power by 1929?
Indicative content:
The answer offers possibilities for a balanced consideration of Germany’s re-emergence from the humiliation of Versailles and economic collapse.
Arguments for recovery:
Candidates might consider the growing involvement of Germany in international negotiations. Despite the failure of the Genoa Conference, the Rapallo Pact with Russia was agreed. More significant recovery stemmed from the Dawes Plan of 1924 which restored some stability to Germany’s economic position and allowed its economy to begin growing again. Anglo–German trade negotiations led to a trade treaty in 1925. The Locarno Pact marked a big step forward and the ‘Spirit of Locarno’ which characterized international relations in the latter part of the 1920s marked German re-admission to the international community, as exemplified by its admission to the League of Nations in 1926. Germany was also a signatory of the Kellogg-Briand Pact and saw its reparations commitment stabilized by the Young Plan which demonstrated Germany’s improved international position by the end of the 1920s.
Arguments against acceptance:
The Ruhr invasion exemplified French mistrust of Germany which had been heightened by the Rapallo Pact. Despite improved relations in the Briand/Stresemann era, this remained. The Locarno agreement eased relations on Germany’s western border but there was no similar improvement on its eastern border and Poland in particular was very critical of Locarno. The harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles remained in place, its colonies were gone, and its armed forces restricted to such a level that it could probably not even defend itself if attacked. Despite the promise of Versailles, no other country showed any sign of disarming and, despite the Kellogg-Briand pact, there were no active talks on arms reduction. Germans still felt aggrieved and unfairly treated and the Wall Street Crash gave extremists the opportunity to capitalize on this perceived inequality. Accept any other valid responses.