Iranian Revolution: Opposition to Westernization
TITLE
‘Opposition to the Shah’s attempts to westernise Iran was the main cause of the Iranian Revolution.
ESSAY
The Iranian Revolution of 1979 marked a significant turning point in Iran's history, replacing a pro-Western monarchy with an anti-Western theocracy under Ayatollah Khomeini's leadership. While opposition to the Shah's attempts to westernize Iran played a crucial role in sparking the revolution, it was not the sole cause. This essay will discuss the various factors that contributed to the Iranian Revolution and assess the significance of opposition to the Shah's westernizing efforts.
One major factor that fueled opposition to the Shah's regime was the Shah's close ties with the United States. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, who became Shah in 1941, pursued a policy of westernization and modernization. He implemented economic reforms that brought rapid urbanization and economic growth to Iran, but these changes also led to social and cultural transformations that threatened traditional institutions and norms. US influence on Iranian culture was perceived as a threat to Iranian identity and sovereignty.
The Shah's partnership with the US also intensified opposition. In 1951, Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh was elected with a promise to nationalize Iran's oil industry, which had been dominated by foreign companies, particularly British-owned Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (later British Petroleum). This move posed a direct challenge to Western economic interests, especially those of the US and Britain. In response, the CIA orchestrated a coup that overthrew Mosaddegh, with the Shah's tacit approval. This event further tarnished the Shah's image and fueled anti-Western sentiments.
Throughout the 1960s, the Shah rushed through modernization programs known as the "White Revolution." While these reforms were economically successful, they alienated religious leaders and traditionalists who feared losing their authority. The Shah dismantled traditional power structures, promoting secular education and establishing secular courts, undermining the institutional basis of clerical power. This repression provoked opposition from religious leaders, intellectuals, and students who sought democratic reforms and a more inclusive government.
The opposition to the Shah's regime was met with brutal repression by the Shah's security and intelligence organization, SAVAK. This suppression of dissent, coupled with corruption and extravagant lifestyles of the ruling elite, contributed to widespread resentment and dissatisfaction among the Iranian population. Economic issues such as inflation and shortages further exacerbated the grievances against the Shah's regime.
In the face of limited political participation and the marginalization of opposition parties, both secular and religious elements united in their resistance against the Shah. Ayatollah Khomeini, in particular, emerged as a prominent critic of the regime. He preached a message of revolt and martyrdom, framing it as a religious duty for Muslims to oppose injustice and tyranny. Khomeini's Islamist movement gained traction, rallying Iranians against the influence of both Western liberalism and communism. The revolutionary slogan "Neither East, nor West – Islamic Republic" captured the rejection of both the Shah's westernizing efforts and foreign interference in Iranian affairs.
In 1977, widespread demonstrations were met with violence from the regime, further inflaming popular discontent. Strikes and protests paralyzed the country in the following months, leading to the Shah's departure into exile in January 1979. The void left by the Shah's departure allowed Ayatollah Khomeini to return to Iran and establish an Islamic theocracy.
In conclusion, while opposition to the Shah's westernizing reforms played a significant role in the Iranian Revolution, it was not the sole cause. The Shah's close ties with the US, authoritarian rule, brutal repression, economic issues, and the rise of an Islamist movement all contributed to the overthrow of the monarchy. The Iranian Revolution marked a turning point in Iran's history, ushering in an anti-Western authoritarian theocracy under Ayatollah Khomeini's leadership.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
A Level
NOTES
‘Opposition to the Shah’s attempts to westernise Iran was the main cause of the Iranian Revolution.’ Assess this view. The Iranian Revolution replaced a pro-Western semi-absolute monarchy with an anti-Western authoritarian theocracy in 1979. A number of factors demonstrated that it was a conservative backlash against the westernising and secularising efforts of the Western-backed Shah. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi became Shah in 1941. He maintained close ties with the United States and pursued a westernising, modernising economic policy as well as a pro-western foreign policy and had the guarantee of US protection. US culture was seen as influencing that of Iran. In 1951 a new prime minister was elected, Mohammad Mosaddegh. He promised to nationalise Iran’s oil industry. He also wanted to reduce the powers of the Shah. Mosaddegh was supported by Iran’s Communist Party and the CIA decided that they needed to remove him from power. A coup was orchestrated with the backing of the Shah adding to the Shah’s unpopularity. Through the 1960s, the Shah rushed through unpopular modernisation programmes in the ‘White Revolution’. The reforms led to rapid urbanisation and westernisation. They were economically successful, but changes to social norms and traditional institutions were widespread. The Shah’s reforms also chipped away at the traditional bases of clerical power with the development of secular courts and emphasis on secular education. However, it was the increasing arbitrariness of the Shah's rule that provoked both religious leaders, who feared losing their traditional authority, and intellectuals and students seeking democratic reforms. The most notable critic was Ruhollah Khomeini, exiled in 1964, whose theories of clerical governance and network of government dissidents brought about the overthrow of the Shah in 1979. Opponents criticised the Shah for violation of the constitution, which placed limits on royal power and provided for a representative government. The Shah's regime suppressed and marginalised its opponents with the help of Iran's security and intelligence organisation, the SAVAK. It became increasingly oppressive, brutal, corrupt, and extravagant. It also suffered from basic functional failures that brought economic bottlenecks, shortages, and inflation. That the revolution replaced the monarchy with Islamism and Khomeini is partly due to the spread of the Shia version of the Islamic revival and to the underestimation of Khomeini’s Islamist movement by the Shah and the secularist opponents of the government. Outlets for political participation were minimal, and opposition parties such as the National Front and the pro-Soviet Tūdeh Party were marginalised or outlawed. Social and political protest was often met with censorship, surveillance, or harassment. The secular intellectuals abandoned their aim of reducing the authority and power of the Shiʿi ulama (religious scholars) and argued that, with their help, the Shah could be overthrown. Khomeini preached that revolt and martyrdom, against injustice and tyranny was part of Shia Islam, and that Muslims should reject the influence of both liberal capitalist and communist ideas that inspired the revolutionary slogan ‘Neither East, nor West – Islamic Republic’. In October 1977 demonstrations against the Shah, begun by several million Iranians, developed into a campaign of civil resistance that included both secular and religious elements. Between August and December 1978, strikes and demonstrations paralysed the country. The Shah left Iran for exile on 16 January 1979. Ayatollah Khomeini was invited back to Iran by the government.