League's Failure on Abyssinia: Impact of British Reluctance
TITLE
To what extent was the League’s failure to prevent Mussolini’s attack on Abyssinia caused by Britain’s reluctance to take action against him?
ESSAY
The League of Nations, established after World War I, was intended to maintain peace and prevent conflicts between nations. However, its failure to prevent Mussolini's attack on Abyssinia in the 1930s raised questions about its effectiveness. One of the key factors contributing to this failure was Britain's reluctance to take action against Italy.
As one of the permanent members of the League, Britain's support was crucial for any successful action. However, the British people did not see any benefit in getting involved in a conflict so far from Britain and with little relevance to them. This reluctance was evident in the secret Hoare-Laval Pact proposed by Hoare of the United Kingdom and Laval of France in late December 1935. The pact aimed to end the war but allowed Italy to control large areas of Ethiopia. Although Mussolini agreed to consider the plan to buy time, he had no intention of accepting it. When the plan was leaked to the media, it caused an outcry and heavy public criticism in the United Kingdom and France. Hoare and Laval were accused of betraying the Abyssinians, and both resigned. This incident further damaged the perception that the United Kingdom was not serious about the League's principles.
Moreover, Britain's reluctance to take serious action against Italy, such as blocking Italian access to the Suez Canal, demonstrated their desire to maintain a positive relationship with Mussolini. This was partly due to his potential role in restricting Hitler's ambitions regarding Austria. Britain prioritized its own national interests over upholding the principles of the League.
Other factors also contributed to the League's failure to prevent Mussolini's attack on Abyssinia. The United States, for instance, was generally indifferent to the League's weak sanctions and even increased its exports to Italy. Additionally, in March 1936, Hitler marched troops into the Rhineland, which had been prohibited by the Treaty of Versailles. The French, desperate to gain Italian support against German aggression directly on their border, were unwilling to take any further action with sanctions. This desperation led them to consider giving Abyssinia to Mussolini, allowing his troops to continue their war relatively unchallenged by the rest of Europe.
Furthermore, the League's structure itself hindered swift response. Unanimous voting and the lack of a strong military force made it difficult for the League to take decisive action against aggressor nations. This structural weakness further undermined the League's ability to prevent Mussolini's attack on Abyssinia.
In conclusion, while there were various factors contributing to the League's failure to prevent Mussolini's attack on Abyssinia, Britain's reluctance to take action against Italy played a significant role. The Hoare-Laval Pact and Britain's desire to maintain a positive relationship with Mussolini demonstrated a lack of commitment to the League's principles. Combined with other factors such as the indifference of the United States and the desperation of France, the League's inability to respond effectively ultimately led to the Italian conquest of Abyssinia and the League's diminished credibility.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
AS Level
NOTES
To what extent was the League’s failure to prevent Mussolini’s attack on Abyssinia caused by Britain’s reluctance to take action against him? Indicative content Discussion of the British response may consider how Britain was one of the permanent members of the League and therefore their support was crucial to any successful action. However, the British people did not see any benefit in getting involved in a conflict so far from Britain and with little relevance to them. In late December 1935, Hoare of the United Kingdom and Laval of France proposed the secret Hoare-Laval Pact, which would have ended the war but allowed Italy to control large areas of Ethiopia. Mussolini agreed to consider the plan to buy time for fear of oil sanctions against Italy, but he had no intention of accepting it. The plan caused an outcry and heavy public criticism in the United Kingdom and France when the plan was leaked to the media. Hoare and Laval were accused of betraying the Abyssinians, and both resigned. The pact was dropped, but the perception spread that the United Kingdom was not serious about the League's principles. The Hoare-Laval Pact showed distrust of Britain towards the League. The United Kingdom did not take any serious action against Italy, such as blocking Italian access to the Suez Canal. Britain basically still wanted to retain a positive relationship with Mussolini because of his potential role in restricting Hitlers ambitions re. Austria. Discussion of other factors may include how the United States, which was generally indifferent to the League's weak sanctions, increased its exports to Italy. It may also consider how, in March 1936, Hitler marched troops into the Rhineland, which had been prohibited by the Treaty of Versailles. The French were now so desperate to get Italian support against German aggression directly on their border that they would not take any further action with sanctions. Since France was prepared to give Abyssinia to Mussolini, his troops were able to continue their war relatively unchallenged by the rest of Europe. Haile Selassie was also forced into exile on 2 May and all of the sanctions that had been put in place by the League were dropped after the Italian capture of the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, on 5 May 1936. Ethiopia was then merged with the other Italian colonies to become Italian East Africa. The League’s structure did not favour swift response, for example it included unanimous voting and lacked military force. Accept any other valid responses.