Missouri Compromise of 1820: Underlying Causes
TITLE
Explain why the Missouri Compromise was agreed in 1820.
ESSAY
The Missouri Compromise, agreed upon in 1820, was a significant event in American history that aimed to maintain the delicate balance of power between slave and non-slave states in Congress. This compromise was reached through a series of negotiations and concessions, ultimately resulting in the admission of Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Additionally, the Compromise established a boundary line, known as the 36°30’ latitude line, above which slavery was prohibited.
The need for the Missouri Compromise arose due to the growing conflict surrounding Missouri's admission into the Union. In 1819, the Tallmadge amendment was proposed, which sought to prohibit the further introduction of slaves into Missouri and provide for the gradual emancipation of those already residing there. This amendment was passed by the House of Representatives, which was predominantly controlled by the more populous Northern states. However, it failed to gain approval in the Senate, where the number of free and slave states was evenly divided.
This deadlock in Congress prompted the need for a compromise that would appease both sides of the slavery debate. The Missouri Compromise emerged as a solution, allowing for the admission of both Missouri and Maine into the Union. By admitting Maine as a free state, the balance of power between slave and non-slave states was maintained. Furthermore, the Compromise established the 36°30’ latitude line, which prohibited slavery in the territories acquired through the Louisiana Purchase.
While the Missouri Compromise appeared to resolve the immediate issue of slavery extension, it was not without its critics. John Quincy Adams, in his diary, expressed his belief that the Compromise was merely a prelude to a larger and more tragic conflict over slavery. Indeed, the Compromise did not address the underlying tensions and disagreements between the North and the South regarding the institution of slavery.
In conclusion, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a significant agreement that aimed to preserve the balance of power between slave and non-slave states in Congress. By admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, and establishing the 36°30’ latitude line, the Compromise sought to address the immediate conflict surrounding Missouri's admission. However, it did not fully resolve the deeper issues surrounding slavery, as later events would demonstrate.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
AS Level
NOTES
Explain why the Missouri Compromise was agreed in 1820. Indicative content The Missouri Compromise was agreed to maintain the balance of power in Congress between slave and non-slave states. As part of the Compromise Missouri was admitted to the Union as a slave state and Maine as a free state. The Compromise also prohibited slavery, above the 36°30’ latitude line (much of this land was part of the Louisiana purchase). The entry of Missouri into the union had been causing conflict for a few years. In 1819, the Tallmadge amendment attempted to prohibit the further introduction of slaves into Missouri and provided for emancipation of those already there when they reached the age of 25. The amendment passed the House of Representatives, controlled by the more-populous North, but failed in the Senate, which was equally divided between free and slave states. This deadlock was broken by the agreement of the Compromise to admit both Missouri and Maine. Although the compromise measures appeared to settle the slaveryextension issue, John Quincy Adams noted in his diary, ‘take it for granted that the present is a mere preamble—a title page to a great, tragic volume’. Accept any other valid responses.