Napoleon's Commitment to Revolutionary Principles 1799-1804
TITLE
How far did Napoleon as First Consul, 1799‒1804, maintain the principles of the Revolution?
ESSAY
Title: Maintaining the Principles of the Revolution: Napoleon as First Consul, 1799‒1804
Introduction:
Napoleon Bonaparte’s rise to power as First Consul in 1799 marked a pivotal moment in French history following the turbulent years of the French Revolution. This essay will explore the extent to which Napoleon maintained the principles of the Revolution during his tenure as First Consul from 1799 to 1804. While some argue that Napoleon continued to uphold key revolutionary ideals, others contend that his actions deviated from the revolutionary spirit.
Maintaining Revolutionary Principles:
1. Popular Support: Napoleon’s popularity and military successes contributed to his role as the figurehead of the coup in 1799. His defense of the Revolution against internal and external enemies, such as in Toulon in 1793 and the Vendémiaire uprising in 1795, illustrated his commitment to revolutionary principles.
2. Use of Plebiscites: Napoleon employed plebiscites as a means of seeking popular consent for his actions, albeit with careful management. While not fully democratic, plebiscites demonstrated a nod to the revolutionary principle of consent.
3. Shared Power: The existence of three consuls to share power distinguished Napoleon’s rule from the monarchical system and Robespierre’s dictatorship, aligning with revolutionary ideas of checks and balances.
4. The Civil Code: Napoleon’s enactment of the Civil Code in 1804 enshrined the principle of equality before the law, reflecting a central tenet of the Revolution.
5. Religious Freedom: The Concordat of 1801 with the Pope upheld the principle of religious freedom, a significant achievement of the Revolution in separating church and state.
6. Administrative Reforms: Napoleon’s reforms in local administration and the fiscal system can be viewed as building upon the groundwork laid during earlier revolutionary periods, fostering governance continuity.
Challenging the View:
1. Limited Democracy: Elections under Napoleon were more of a façade, restricted to notables and lacking true democratic participation.
2. Gender Inequality: The Civil Code reinforced male authority and undermined women’s rights, eroding gains made by women during the Revolution.
3. Concordat with the Pope: Some saw the Concordat as a betrayal of revolutionary progress, compromising the Church-state separation achieved since 1789.
4. Centralization of Power: Napoleon’s policies favored greater centralization, granting him more personal control and straying from the decentralized ethos of the Revolution.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, Napoleon’s tenure as First Consul from 1799 to 1804 involved a complex interplay of maintaining revolutionary principles while also making significant departures from them. While he implemented reforms that aligned with key revolutionary ideals, his consolidation of power and policies that contradicted certain revolutionary gains reveal a nuanced relationship between Napoleon and the principles of the French Revolution. Ultimately, the evaluation of Napoleon’s legacy as First Consul must consider both his adherence to and departure from revolutionary principles in shaping France’s trajectory during this pivotal period in history.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
AS LEVEL
NOTES
**How Far Did Napoleon as First Consul, 1799‒1804, Maintain the Principles of the Revolution?**
Arguments to support the view that he did maintain the principles of the Revolution could be as follows. Napoleon was the figurehead of the coup in 1799 because his military successes had made him popular, and he had shown that he was a defender of the Revolution against its enemies (e.g., Toulon, 1793 and the royalist Vendémiaire uprising, 1795). His policies as First Consul can be said to have not openly contradicted his claim that he was continuing the best features of the Revolution. For example, plebiscites were used as a form of popular consent, albeit carefully managed. They did, nonetheless, pay some lip-service to the revolutionary idea of consent. There were three consuls to share power: a difference from the monarchy and Robespierre’s dictatorship. The Civil Code did enshrine the principle of equality for all before the law, a key revolutionary belief. The Concordat of 1801 with the Pope did uphold the principle of religious freedom, a clear revolutionary ideal. His actions regarding local administration and the fiscal system can be seen as completing work begun in 1789–1793 and 1795– 1799.
However, the view can be challenged. The democratic element of elections was minimal, as they were more the presentation of candidates, restricted to the notables, seen as suitable for selection as deputies. The Civil Code emphasised male authority and the rights of the father, and so undermined many gains made by women during the Revolution. The Concordat with the Pope was seen by many revolutionaries as a betrayal of all that had been achieved since 1789 in limiting the power and influence of the Catholic Church in France. The Civil Code allowed for greater centralisation and, thereby, greater personal control for Napoleon. Accept any other valid responses.