The Economic Crisis: Fueling Nazi Support in Germany (1929-1932)
TITLE
‘The main reason for the growth of Nazi support between 1929 and 1932 was the growing economic crisis in Germany.
ESSAY
The growth of Nazi support between 1929 and 1932 in Germany is a complex and multi-faceted issue that cannot be attributed solely to the economic crisis. While the economic hardships faced by the German population undoubtedly played a significant role in increasing support for the Nazi party, it is important to consider other factors that contributed to their rise to power.
The economic crisis that struck Germany in the late 1920s and early 1930s certainly created fertile ground for extremist political movements like the Nazis to gain support. The Great Depression led to skyrocketing unemployment rates, widespread poverty, and a sense of hopelessness among the German population. In this climate of despair, the Nazi party's anti-Semitic, nationalist, and anti-establishment rhetoric found resonance among those who were looking for someone to blame for their suffering.
However, it would be simplistic to attribute the Nazi's success solely to the economic crisis. The party had been steadily building support even before the economic downturn, with Adolf Hitler's charisma and ability to exploit grievances playing a crucial role. The Nazis' flexible ideology, which incorporated a wide range of grievances and promises of national revival, allowed them to attract support from different segments of society, including industrial workers, farmers, and the middle class.
Moreover, the Nazis' propaganda machine and organizational strength were key factors in their rise to power. The party used modern techniques of mass communication and political campaigning to spread their message effectively and mobilize supporters. Hitler's ability to tap into people's emotions and offer a vision of renewal and rebirth further contributed to the party's appeal.
In addition to the economic crisis, other factors such as the weaknesses of the Weimar Republic, divisions within the German society, fear of communism, and the legacy of World War I also played a role in the growth of Nazi support. The Treaty of Versailles and the perceived humiliation of Germany after the war fueled nationalist sentiments that the Nazis were able to exploit for their own gain.
In conclusion, while the economic crisis was undoubtedly a significant factor in the growth of Nazi support in Germany between 1929 and 1932, it is important to consider the broader context and other factors that contributed to the party's rise to power. The Nazis' ability to exploit the crisis, their charismatic leader, effective propaganda, and ideological appeal all played crucial roles in their success, alongside the economic hardships faced by the German population.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
A LEVEL
NOTES
“The main reason for the growth of Nazi support between 1929 and 1932 was the growing economic crisis in Germany.”
Assess this view.
There is a strong case for this explanation. Even with signs of electoral gains in 1928 and a strong infrastructure, the actual electoral support for the NSDAP was not great. However, as depression hit from the Autumn of 1929, the votes for both Communists and Nazis grew in response to increased disillusion with the politicians’ response to rapidly rising unemployment, bank, and business failures.
The high point of Nazi electoral success in 1932 coincided with a peak in unemployment and deflationary policies, which left millions lacking basic necessities and hope for the future. Nazi propaganda found scapegoats for the economic problems (the Treaty of Versailles, the November Criminals, the Jews, the American plutocrats) and unemployment increased. Combined with the threat of communism, which alarmed the Mittelstand and the German elites, it seems there is an unassailable connection between economic problems and the support for the Nazis both locally and nationally.
The German farmers had already been facing falling prices and now saw a massively reduced market. The Mittelstand already hit by the inflation of the 1920s now saw a collapse of international and national consumption, and business failures. The industrial workers saw mass unemployment and lost the safety net of Weimar welfare as cuts were made.
The counter argument is more to do with the Nazis’ ability to exploit the crisis which might be seen as more important than the crisis itself. By 1928 support was rising, especially in depressed rural areas. The party had developed an impressive organisation. It had a flexible ideology, which encompassed all sorts of grievances, and wrapped them round with some powerful themes; anti Semitism, the Hitler myth, the betrayal of the nation by the politicians, and nationalist traditions. This ideological hold all meant that all sorts of people could support Nazism even if their interests seemed incompatible.
The NSBO had gained a foothold among industrial workers while monarchists were inspired by nationalist rhetoric and visions of a golden age. National revival propaganda went beyond simply job creation, and the 1920 programme held anti-Capitalist as well as anti-Communist views. Hitler’s personal appeal did not really depend on economic policy (which was vague) as much as castigation of enemies, and a powerful emotional appeal for renewal and rebirth.
None of this was new, so it could be argued that it only struck a mass chord when economic crisis seemed to show that Germany had been betrayed. But it was the interplay between the rising economic crisis and the sort of appeal that had been developing since 1920. Developed analyses might see these connections, and weight the relative importance of the strictly economic factors with other explanations.