top of page

The Role of Churches in Resisting Nazi Rule: A Critical Examination

TITLE

How significant were the churches in the opposition to Nazi rule after 1933?

ESSAY

The significance of churches in the opposition to Nazi rule after 1933 is a complex and debated topic. Both the Catholic and Protestant churches played diverse roles in challenging the Nazi regime, but the extent of their impact is subject to interpretation.

On the YES side, it is clear that there were individuals within the Catholic Church who actively opposed Nazi policies. For example, Bishop Galen's public denunciation of the T-4 Programme, which targeted the mentally ill and disabled for extermination, drew attention to the regime's atrocities and led to a shift in public opinion. Additionally, the formation of the Confessing Church by Pastor Niemoller and Bonhoeffer showed resistance to Nazi attempts at controlling the Protestant churches. Many ministers within both Catholic and Protestant churches used their pulpit to speak out against Nazi ideology and support resistance efforts.

However, on the NO side, it is also important to recognize that the churches were not monolithic entities. The Concordat signed between the Catholic Church and the Nazi regime in 1933 effectively kept the church in check and limited its opposition. Many churchgoers supported the regime or did not actively resist it, especially within the Reich Church under Bishop Muller. Furthermore, the Nazis promoted alternative pagan ideologies like the German Faith Movement, which attracted followers away from traditional churches.

In assessing the significance of the churches in the opposition to Nazi rule, it is important to consider the broader context of resistance movements in Nazi Germany. Underground political parties, trade unions, youth groups like the Swing Movement and Edelweiss Pirates, and intellectual circles like the White Rose all played crucial roles in challenging the regime. Military figures like Blomberg and Fritsch, who opposed Hitler's aggressive war plans, as well as the multiple assassination attempts on Hitler, illustrate the extent of opposition within the armed forces.

In conclusion, while the churches, particularly the Catholic and Protestant denominations, did contribute to the opposition against Nazi rule, their impact must be considered in conjunction with other resistance movements and factors. The complexity of individual actions, official church stances, and the overall resistance landscape in Nazi Germany all play a role in determining the overall significance of the churches in opposing the Nazi regime after 1933.

SUBJECT

HISTORY

PAPER

O LEVEL

NOTES

**How significant were the churches in the opposition to Nazi rule after 1933? Explain your answer.**

YES – Catholic Church: some Catholic priests helped protect persecuted minorities; Bishop Galen spoke out against Nazi policies and T-34 Programme (killing of mentally ill and physically disabled); Nazis failed to silence him and led to a change in public policy; Pope still able to criticise Nazi regime from Rome; Protestant Churches: Pastor Niemoller and Bonhoeffer created Confessing Church and opposed Nazi interference in Church; many ministers opposed Reich Church; many preached against Nazis in church sermons and aided resistance groups, etc.

NO – Concordat in 1933 effectively got Catholic Church on side with the Nazi regime; many churchgoers supported Nazi regime or did little to oppose it and attended the Reich Church under Bishop Muller; Nazis also attempted German Faith Movement – a pagan alternative; more significant – underground political parties and trade unions distributed leaflets and encouraged strikes; Swing Movement; Edelweiss Pirates; White Rose; army resistance – Blomberg and Fritsch opposed Nazi war plans; 5 attempts by military to assassinate Hitler – 1944 July Bomb Plot; low-level resistance (anti-Nazi jokes); conservative Kreisau Circle, etc.

bottom of page