top of page

Weimar Politics and Hitler's Ascent in 1933

TITLE

‘Weimar politicians were mostly responsible for Hitler’s rise to power in January 1933’.

ESSAY

The rise of Adolf Hitler to power in January 1933 is a complex and multifaceted event that cannot be attributed solely to the misjudgments of Weimar politicians. While it is true that the failures of successive governments, led by Müller, Brüning, von Papen, and von Schleicher, to effectively address the economic problems facing Germany as a result of the Great Depression played a significant role, there are other factors that must be considered in order to provide a balanced analysis.

One alternative explanation for Hitler's rise to power is the unpopularity of the Weimar Republic itself. The armistice and Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, were deeply resented by many Germans, leading to a sense of betrayal and disillusionment with the democratic government. This sentiment was further exacerbated by the unfamiliarity with democratic governance, as Germany had previously been ruled by an autocratic monarchy. The Weimar constitution, with its provision for coalition government through proportional representation and the ability to pass emergency decrees through Article 48, also contributed to disillusionment with democracy and allowed the Nazis to exploit this sentiment for their own gain.

The impact of the Great Depression cannot be underestimated in understanding Hitler's rise to power. The economic crisis led to bankruptcies, unemployment, and a banking crisis, creating a widespread feeling that parliamentary democracy was unable to effectively address the scale of the crisis. This created fertile ground for extremist ideologies, including Nazism, to gain support. The promises of work and bread, the crushing of the communist threat, and the restoration of German pride offered by Hitler and the Nazi party resonated with many people who were desperate for a solution to their economic woes.

Furthermore, the growth of support for communism in Germany during this period cannot be ignored. Many sections of society, including the middle classes and business and landowners, were seeking a savior to protect them from the perceived threat of communism. Hitler and the Nazis skillfully presented themselves as the answer to this threat, gaining support from powerful financial backers and appealing to a wide range of social groups.

While the misjudgments of Weimar politicians certainly played a role in Hitler's appointment as chancellor in 1933, it is important to recognize the interconnectedness of these factors. The failures of successive governments to address the economic crisis, the unpopularity of the Weimar Republic, the impact of the Great Depression, and the appeal of Hitler and Nazism all contributed to his rise to power. It was a combination of these factors that ultimately allowed Hitler to seize control of Germany and set the stage for the horrors of the Nazi regime.

SUBJECT

HISTORY

PAPER

A Level

NOTES

‘Weimar politicians were mostly responsible for Hitler’s rise to power in January 1933’. Discuss this view. This question requires a balanced discussion of the factors behind Hitler’s appointment as chancellor in 1933. The misjudgements of Weimar politicians between 1929 and 1933 should be balanced against other alternative explanations. It should be possible at the higher levels to show how these factors can be interconnected. Examples which could be used in support of the statement: The failures of successive governments, led by Müller, Brüning, von Papen and von Schelicher to deal with the economic problems facing Germany as a result of the Great Depression. The nature of coalition government and divisions, for example of the rate of unemployment benefit in 1930. The increasing reliance on emergency decrees to rule. The miscalculation made by Hindenburg and Papen in appointing Hitler as chancellor in January 1933, based on the assumption that they would be able to control him. Alternatives which could be advanced to create a balanced argument include: The unpopularity of the Weimar Republic, initially relating to the armistice and Treaty of Versailles, and unfamiliarity with democratic government. Discussion of events prior to 1929 should be linked to the growth of support for Nazism in the years 1929–33. The Weimar constitution which allowed for coalition government through its use of proportional representation and for emergency decrees to be passed through Article 48. This led to increased disillusionment with democracy and allowed the Nazis to promote its destruction for the greater good of Germany. The impact of the Great Depression on Germany, leading to bankruptcies, unemployment and a banking crisis, and to a growing feeling that parliamentary democracy was unable to cope with the scale of the crisis. This could link to the arguments in favour of the statement. The growth of support for communism in Germany, which meant that many sections of society were seeking a saviour. This particularly led to support from the middle classes and from business and land owners, including powerful financial backers. The appeal of Hitler and Nazism, offering a dynamic response to the problems facing Germany. The promises of work and bread, to crush the communist threat and to restore German pride were popular with many people and were skilfully presented through effective propaganda campaigns.

bottom of page