Exploring Suspect Rights
TITLE
Discuss the extent to which these rights protect the suspect.
ESSAY
Title: The extent to which rights protect suspects in the English legal system
Introduction
In the English legal system, suspects are afforded certain rights and protections under various legislation and codes of practice. These rights aim to ensure that suspects are treated fairly during criminal investigations and criminal proceedings. This essay will discuss the extent to which these rights protect suspects, considering both the advantages and limitations of these protections.
Time Limits
One way in which suspects are protected is through the imposition of time limits on pre💥charge detention. These time limits prevent suspects from being held in custody for unnecessarily long periods, thereby safeguarding their right to liberty. However, it is important to note that these time limits may also hinder police investigations by restricting the amount of time they have to gather evidence and conduct interviews.
Appropriate Adult
Another important protection for suspects is the requirement for an appropriate adult to be present during police interviews if the suspect is deemed to be vulnerable due to age or mental incapacity. This ensures that vulnerable suspects are not exploited or subjected to oppressive questioning. However, this requirement may limit the flexibility of the police in conducting interviews, particularly in cases where informal questioning occurs prior to the suspect's arrival at the police station, as highlighted in R v Halliwell (2012).
Recording of Interviews
The recording of police interviews serves as a crucial protection for suspects by ensuring the accuracy of the evidence obtained and preventing oppressive questioning practices. Moreover, interview rules help to safeguard suspects from the potential fabrication of evidence by the police. Nonetheless, these rules may pose challenges for law enforcement when informal questioning takes place before the suspect arrives at the police station.
Right to Inform Someone
Allowing suspects to inform someone of their detention is essential to prevent their "disappearance" into the criminal justice system. This right serves as a safeguard against potential abuses of power by law enforcement.
Right to Legal Representation
The provision of legal representation for suspects ensures that they are properly advised and assisted throughout the legal process. However, there may be significant delays in providing duty solicitors, which could disadvantage the suspect in terms of obtaining timely advice and support.
Record Keeping
The requirement for custody officers to keep comprehensive records of a suspect's detention is crucial in monitoring the conditions of their custody and ensuring accountability. Nonetheless, research has shown that approximately 10% of these records have been found to be falsified, raising concerns about the reliability of this safeguard.
Exclusion of Evidence
Under sections 76 and 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE), evidence can be excluded if the rules regarding its collection and handling are not followed, and if its admission would have an adverse effect on the fairness of the trial. This provision acts as a key safeguard to protect suspects against the use of unreliable or unlawfully obtained evidence.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the rights and protections afforded to suspects in the English legal system play a crucial role in safeguarding their fundamental rights and ensuring fair treatment during criminal investigations and proceedings. While these measures provide significant safeguards, it is essential to recognize their limitations and potential challenges, such as delays in legal representation and instances of falsified record💥keeping. Continual evaluation and improvement of these protections are necessary to uphold the principles of justice and due process in the criminal justice system.
SUBJECT
LAW
PAPER
A level and AS level
NOTES
Title: Analysis of Suspect Rights Protection under Law
💥 Protection is given by law under act and codes of practice.
💥 Time limits prevent suspect being held in custody for unnecessarily long periods of time. However, time limits may hinder police investigations.
💥 Appropriate adult protects the vulnerable through age or mental incapacity.
💥 Recording of interviews ensures accuracy of evidence and prevents oppressive questioning.
💥 Interview rules also protect suspects from the potential of police fabrication of evidence. However, it may hinder police where informal questioning occurs prior to arriving at the police station (R v Halliwell, 2012).
💥 Allowing the suspect to inform someone prevents 'disappearance' into the system.
💥 The provision of legal representation ensures the suspect is properly advised. However, there may be long delays for duty solicitors.
💥 Records by the custody officer monitor the suspect's detention. However, about 10% of records have been found to be falsified (Sanders & Bridge's research).
💥 Evidence can be excluded if rules are not followed, and there would be an adverse effect on fairness (s76 and s78 PACE).
Candidate responses marked in Table C will vary based on the depth of analysis and evaluation of these points in relation to the extent they protect the suspect.