Examine the impact of individual patterns of cognition on the results of Andrade's study on doodling.

Title: Examine the Impact of Individual Patterns of Cognition on the Results of Andrade's Study on Doodling

Introduction:
Andrade's study on doodling, published in 2009, examined the effects of doodling on cognitive performance and information retention. The study found that individuals who doodled while listening to a recorded message retained more information compared to those who did not doodle. However, the impact of individual patterns of cognition on the results of this study is a topic of interest and warrants further exploration.

Individual Differences in Cognitive Styles:
One important factor to consider when examining the impact of individual patterns of cognition on the results of Andrade's study is individual differences in cognitive styles. Cognitive styles refer to individual differences in how people perceive, organize, and process information. Some individuals may have a more visual-spatial cognitive style, while others may have a more verbal-analytical cognitive style.

The Impact of Cognitive Style on Doodling:
Individuals with a visual-spatial cognitive style may be more likely to engage in doodling as a way to aid their information processing. Doodling, which involves creating visual images or patterns, may serve as a supplementary task for individuals with a visual processing bias. In contrast, individuals with a verbal-analytical cognitive style may find doodling to be a distracting task that interferes with their ability to focus on auditory information.

Furthermore, individuals with a high level of creativity may be more inclined to engage in doodling as a way to express themselves and stimulate their imagination. This could potentially enhance their cognitive performance by promoting a relaxed and open mindset conducive to information retention.

The Role of Mind Wandering and Attention:
Another important aspect to consider is the role of mind wandering and attention in relation to doodling. Individuals who tend to have wandering thoughts or struggle to maintain attention on a single task may benefit from doodling as a way to keep themselves engaged and prevent their minds from drifting away from the main task at hand. In this sense, doodling may serve as a cognitive aid for individuals with attentional difficulties.

However, individuals who are highly focused and attentive may not experience the same benefits from doodling, as their cognitive resources are already actively engaged in processing the incoming information. For these individuals, doodling may serve as a distraction rather than a facilitator of cognitive performance.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, individual patterns of cognition play a significant role in determining the impact of doodling on cognitive performance and information retention, as demonstrated by Andrade's study. Factors such as cognitive style, creativity, mind wandering, and attention all influence how individuals engage with doodling and the extent to which it affects their cognitive processes. Future research should continue to explore the intricate interplay between individual differences in cognition and the efficacy of doodling as a cognitive tool.