top of page

Maintaining Affordable Rice Prices for Low-Income Households

TITLE

A government wishes to keep the price of an essential food, such as rice, affordable to help low💥income households.

ESSAY

Title: Assessing the Effectiveness of Price Fixing vs. Transfer Payments in Helping Low💥Income Households Access Essential Food

Introduction:
In addressing the issue of affordability of essential food such as rice for low💥income households, governments have the option of implementing a maximum pricing policy or providing transfer payments. This essay will evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each approach and consider their relative effectiveness in assisting low💥income consumers.

Maximum Pricing Policy:
Advantages:
💥 Setting the price below the equilibrium level makes essential food more affordable for low💥income consumers.
💥 Improves living standards and health outcomes for low💥income households.

Disadvantages:
💥 Creates shortages in the market, leading to informal channels and potential black markets.
💥 Government enforcement of price controls may require increased spending.
💥 Both rich and poor households benefit equally, potentially leading to inefficiencies.

Transfer Payments:
Advantages:
💥 Targeted assistance to those most in need.
💥 Can be specifically directed towards the purchase of essential food items.

Disadvantages:
💥 Costly with opportunity costs for governments.
💥 Possibility of misuse or diversion of resources away from intended purposes.

Evaluation:
In determining the effectiveness of a maximum pricing policy versus transfer payments in helping low💥income consumers access essential food, several factors must be considered. These include the impact on low💥income households, the potential for market distortions, administrative costs, and the likelihood of achieving the desired outcomes.

Conclusion:
While both approaches have their merits and drawbacks, a targeted transfer payment system may be more effective in assisting low💥income households access essential food. Transfer payments can directly address the needs of those most in need, without distorting market mechanisms or creating shortages. Additionally, by focusing resources on specific individuals or households, governments can ensure that assistance reaches its intended beneficiaries. Therefore, in conclusion, a policy of providing transfer payments to low💥income households is likely to be more effective in helping low💥income consumers access essential food compared to a maximum pricing policy.

SUBJECT

ECONOMICS

PAPER

A level and AS level

NOTES

🌟Question:🌟
A government wishes to keep the price of an essential food, such as rice, affordable to help low💥income households. Assess whether a policy of fixing the maximum price for an essential food is likely to be more effective than a policy of making transfer payments to low💥income households.

🌟Indicative Content:🌟

🌟AO1 Knowledge and Understanding and AO2 Analysis (max 8 marks)🌟

The advantages and disadvantages of using a maximum pricing policy may include:

💥 If the price is set below the equilibrium price and quantity, then it will make e.g., rice more affordable.
💥 This will help low💥income consumers and improve their living standards and improve their health BUT
💥 It will create a shortage and informal markets may arise.
💥 Governments may have to increase their spending to enforce the legislation.
💥 Rich and poor households gain equally.

Transfer payments may include:

💥 Unemployment benefits
💥 Pensions
💥 Food vouchers etc.

The advantages and disadvantages include:

💥 They can be targeted at those most in need.
💥 They can be targeted at the purchase of basic foodstuffs BUT
💥 May be costly and have an opportunity cost.
💥 The policies may not be used for their intended purposes (even vouchers may be sold in illegal markets)

A one💥sided response can only gain a maximum of Level 2.

🌟AO3 Evaluation (max 4 marks)🌟

💥 Consideration of the relative effectiveness of a maximum pricing policy compared with the use of transfer payments.
💥 Consider the impact on low💥income consumers of basic foodstuffs.
💥 In conclusion, which policy is most likely to be effective in helping low💥income consumers.

bottom of page