top of page

Failure of World Disarmament Conference

TITLE

Explain why the World Disarmament Conference ended in failure.

ESSAY

The World Disarmament Conference, initiated in 1932, was aimed at achieving a global agreement to reduce the militaries of various countries and prevent another devastating war like World War I. Unfortunately, the conference ended in failure due to several key reasons that led to irreconcilable positions among the participating nations.

One major point of contention was Germany's demand for other countries to disarm to the same level it had been limited to by the Treaty of Versailles. Germany argued that it had already been unfairly restricted in its military capabilities and sought parity with other nations. This demand clashed with the concerns of countries like France, which harbored deep fears of German aggression. The French government refused to agree to disarmament without additional security guarantees that would protect them from a resurgent Germany.

Furthermore, while Britain and the United States supported the idea of disarmament in principle, they were hesitant to provide further security promises that could embroil them in potential conflicts. This lack of commitment to providing concrete security guarantees hindered progress at the conference.

Another obstacle to reaching an agreement was the lack of consensus on what constituted offensive and defensive weapons. Different countries had varying perspectives on this issue, making it difficult to establish a common framework for disarmament.

The situation worsened when talks resumed in 1933 and Adolf Hitler's regime came to power in Germany. Hitler withdrew Germany from the conference, signaling a breakdown in the collective efforts towards disarmament. This move by Germany further exacerbated tensions and reduced the likelihood of reaching a successful agreement.

Additionally, Japan's aggression in invading Manchuria in September 1931 and subsequent withdrawal from the League of Nations weakened international efforts towards disarmament. Japan's actions undermined the willingness of other nations to disarm, as they prioritized security in the face of rising militarism in certain parts of the world.

In conclusion, the World Disarmament Conference failed due to the inability of participating nations to reconcile their non-negotiable positions. Germany's demands for parity, French security concerns, reluctance from Britain and the United States to provide guarantees, disagreements on weapon classifications, Hitler's rise to power, and Japan's aggressive actions all contributed to the breakdown of the conference. These factors underscored the complex geopolitical dynamics and diverging interests that ultimately prevented the achievement of a global disarmament agreement.

SUBJECT

HISTORY

PAPER

AS LEVEL

NOTES

Why the World Disarmament Conference ended in failure:

- There were several non-negotiable ‘positions’ that could simply not be reconciled.
- From the start in 1932 Germany demanded other countries should disarm to the same level that it had been limited to by the Treaty of Versailles.
- French fears of Germany meant they refused disarmament without further security guarantees.
- Britain and the USA were unwilling to provide further security promises.
- There was no agreement on which were offensive and defensive weapons.
- When talks resumed in 1933 Hitler had come to power and withdrew Germany from the Conference.
- Japan attacked Manchuria in September 1931 followed by withdrawal from the League which seriously weakened willingness of theirs to disarm.

Accept any other valid responses.

bottom of page