top of page

Republican Party and 1850s Tensions

TITLE

‘The rise of the Republican Party was the main cause of increased sectional tensions in the 1850s.’ How far do you agree?

ESSAY

The rise of the Republican Party in the 1850s was indeed a significant cause of increased sectional tensions during that time period. The foundation of the Republican Party in Ripon, Wisconsin in 1854 built upon existing sectional tensions and further divided the nation along North-South lines. The party's main objective was to prevent the spread of slavery in the territories, a goal that the disintegrating Whig Party had failed to achieve. By explicitly advocating for the interests of the Northern states, the Republican Party provoked outrage among many Southerners, including those who had previously considered themselves moderate. This growing divide in the political system highlighted the increasing sectional tensions within the country.

Furthermore, the disagreements over the Kansas-Nebraska Act played a crucial role in the rise of the Republican Party and the subsequent increase in sectional tensions. The act, proposed in 1854, aimed to open the Kansas and Nebraska territories for settlement and determine their stance on slavery through popular sovereignty. However, this decision directly contradicted the Missouri Compromise, which had prohibited slavery north of the 36°30' line. The introduction of popular sovereignty led to a flood of pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers into Kansas, resulting in violent conflicts between the two factions. The Battle of Osawatomie in 1856, where John Brown fought, exemplified the tensions and bloodshed that ensued. This period of violence and unrest became known as "Bleeding Kansas," further exacerbating the sectional tensions between the North and the South.

While the rise of the Republican Party was a significant cause of increased sectional tensions, it is important to acknowledge other factors that contributed to this divide. One such factor was the Fugitive Slave Act, which was included in the Compromise of 1850. This act required Northerners to capture and return fugitive slaves, a measure that many felt violated their constitutional rights. Northerners opposed this act, viewing it as a betrayal of their commitment to ending slavery. Conversely, Southerners saw the Fugitive Slave Act as a necessary component of the Compromise, ensuring the preservation of slavery. The ongoing debates and disagreements surrounding the Fugitive Slave Act further heightened sectional tensions and added to the growing divide between the North and the South.

In conclusion, while there were other causes of increased sectional tensions in the 1850s, such as the Fugitive Slave Act, the rise of the Republican Party played a significant role in exacerbating these tensions. The party's formation and its explicit focus on preventing the spread of slavery in the territories further divided the nation along sectional lines. Additionally, the conflicts and violence that arose from the Kansas-Nebraska Act, as well as the ongoing debates over the Fugitive Slave Act, contributed to the growing divide between the North and the South. Therefore, it can be argued that the rise of the Republican Party was indeed the main cause of increased sectional tensions in the 1850s.

SUBJECT

HISTORY

PAPER

AS Level

NOTES

‘The rise of the Republican Party was the main cause of increased sectional tensions in the 1850s.’ How far do you agree? Indicative content Possible discussions about the rise of the Republican party might include how the foundation of the Republican Party in Ripon, Wisconsin in 1854 built upon existing sectional tensions. The party’s main aim was to prevent the spread of slavery in the territories which the disintegrating Whig Party had failed to do. It was a political party which was clearly aimed at just the Northern section and was designed to fight for their views. This caused outrage amongst many Southerners even those who had previously regarded themselves as moderate. It showed that the political system was becoming increasingly split along sectional lines. Also, the disagreements over Kansas–Nebraska Act saw the Republicans rapidly gain support in the north and in 1856 their first presidential candidate, John C. Fremont, won 11 of the 16 Northern states. Possible discussions about other causes of sectional tension in the 1850s might consider the application of the Fugitive Slave Act which was included in the Compromise of 1850 caused sectional tensions to increase. Many Northerners felt that being made to capture and return fugitive slaves was against their constitutional rights. On the other hand, Southern public opinion felt it was part of the commitment of the Compromise to not destroying slavery completely. The continuing discussions over the Fugitive Slave Act meant that tensions were constantly being brought to the fore. Additionally, in 1854, the Kansas–Nebraska act was proposed to open the territory for building the Transcontinental Railroad. However, there was concern because the territory was North of the 36, 30 line and so slavery was forbidden under the Missouri Compromise. To resolve this Stephen Douglas proposed popular sovereignty in the state to allow settlers to decide whether it should be slave or free. Following the decision that Popular Sovereignty would be used the state was flooded by pro-slavery settlers and abolitionists wanting to vote in elections and decide how the state should be run. Two rival state capitals were set up; one that was pro-slavery in Lecompton and the abolitionists in Topeka. The tensions led to open warfare in the territory between pro and anti-slavery settlers; one example was the Battle of Osawatomie in 1856 where John Brown fought. The term ‘Bleeding Kansas’ was used to describe the conflict. Accept any other valid responses.

bottom of page