The Impact of Economic Challenges on Political Extremism in Britain
TITLE
‘Economic problems were the main reason for the rise of political extremism in Britain.
ESSAY
The rise of political extremism in Britain during the early 20th century can indeed be attributed in part to economic problems, although other factors also played significant roles. The context of British political extremism primarily revolved around the Communist Party and the British Union of Fascists, aligning with the broader trends of left and right-wing extremism in Europe following the aftermath of the First World War.
Economic issues undoubtedly influenced the appeal of extremist ideologies in Britain. The examples of the Bolshevik takeover in Russia and the rise of Fascism in post-war Italy showcased how severe economic problems could lead to the emergence of radical political movements. The Great Depression that followed in the late 1920s further galvanized support for extremist ideologies across Europe, including in Britain. The economic downturn, rising unemployment, and decline of heavy industries provided fertile ground for the promotion of alternative political systems that offered seemingly radical solutions.
However, the relationship between economic hardships and political extremism was not always straightforward. It is worth noting that Fascism gained traction in areas like London, rather than the traditionally economically depressed regions of the North. The appeal of Fascism to the lower middle-class, based on concerns about Communism and ideological attraction, went beyond purely economic motivations. Similarly, the support for Fascism in unexpected areas like South coast resorts suggests that factors other than economic woes were at play.
Communism, on the other hand, did not experience widespread support amongst the working class in Britain despite prevailing economic discontent. The ideological enthusiasm for Marxist theory, which had deep roots dating back to the 1880s, resonated with a segment of the discontented middle and upper classes as well as politically aware workers. The allure of a foreign ideology like Communism, based on Russian origins, acted as a positive stimulus for some supporters. Despite economic hardships, the limited number of active Communist supporters and the lack of mass electoral backing indicate that factors beyond economic problems were necessary to explain support for these alternative political parties that diverged from traditional British political norms.
In summary, while economic problems certainly played a role in the rise of political extremism in Britain, including the spread of Communism and Fascism, it is essential to consider other motivating factors as well. Ideological considerations, concerns about the political establishment, admiration for strong leadership figures, and historical tensions like anti-Semitism all contributed to the appeal of extremism in British society during this period.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
A LEVEL
NOTES
‘Economic problems were the main reason for the rise of political extremism in Britain.’ Discuss this view.
In terms of the British political context, extremism was mainly seen as the Communist Party and the British Union of Fascists, reflecting the rise of extremes to left and right that emerged in Europe as a result of the First World War. These models for British enthusiasts were obviously partly a result of economic issues as Russians faced severe economic problems prior to the Bolshevik take over and post war Italy suffered from both longand short-term economic ills. The links between the rise of Hitler after 1929 and the effects of the great depression are obvious.
In Britain, the post-war boom was short lived, and sectors of the economy suffered depression. Poverty and economic decline were a fuel for support both for Communism and Fascism and after 1929 the increase in unemployment and the serious decline of heavy industry could be said to have raised interest in and support for alternative political systems which offered far more radical solutions than traditional parties. However, there was not always a direct correlation between economic hardship and extremism. Fascism was strong in London rather than in the depressed areas of the North.
Like Nazism it attracted many lower middle-class supporters worried about the rise of Communism and attracted by ideology. Surprising support could be found in unlikely areas like South coast resorts like Worthing. It could be argued that the impoverished middle classes aware of the seeming successes of Mussolini and attracted by love of Empire and admiration for the unity and military spirit often found in the First World War were not primarily motivated by economic concerns. The anti-Semitism in London was based on long standing tensions in some areas and admiration for a strong potential leader who had broken with a dull political establishment might be seen as another strong motive.
Communism produced no Mosley figure and no Lenin equivalent. Given the widespread economic discontent it did not attract mass working-class support. It had roots in ideological enthusiasm for Marxist theory from the 1880s and attracted discontented middle and even upper-class elements as well as many politically aware and self-educated workers. The alienating effects of a Russian based creed were less apparent to them and even acted as a positive stimulus. The relatively small numbers of active supporters and the lack of mass electoral support despite economic hardship might suggest that other factors were needed to interact with economic problems to explain support for parties which fell outside customary British political life and traditions.