The Role of Israeli Aggression in Middle East Conflict (1956-1973)
TITLE
How important was Israeli aggression as a cause of conflict, 1956–73?
ESSAY
The Israeli aggression played a significant role as a cause of conflict between 1956 and 1973, but it was not the sole or most important factor. Israeli actions, such as the invasion of Egypt in 1956 and the pre-emptive strike in the Six Day War of 1967, undoubtedly escalated tensions in the region and led to conflicts. The Israeli military's use of force and their rearmament with the help of Western powers also contributed to the volatile situation.
However, it is crucial to consider other factors that were equally, if not more, important in shaping the conflicts during this period. The roles of Britain and France in the 1956 Suez Crisis cannot be overlooked, as their involvement alongside Israel in the invasion of Egypt had significant consequences and fueled anti-Western sentiments in the Arab world.
Additionally, the actions of Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser in both 1956 and 1967 played a pivotal role in the conflicts. Nasser's nationalization of the Suez Canal in 1956 and his aggressive rhetoric against Israel helped create a climate of hostility. The formation of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and their raids into Israel added another dimension to the ongoing conflicts.
Superpower involvement, particularly the Cold War dynamics between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, also had a substantial impact on the conflicts in the region. The 1973 Yom Kippur War, initiated by Egyptian President Anwar Sadat's surprise attack across the Suez Canal, demonstrated the complex web of alliances and rivalries that influenced the conflict.
Furthermore, the rise of Arab nationalism and the involvement of other Arab states, such as Syria and the Baath Party, added layers of complexity to the conflicts during this period. The historical and ideological context of the Arab-Israeli conflict cannot be reduced solely to Israeli aggression but is intertwined with a multitude of political, social, and regional factors.
In conclusion, while Israeli aggression was an important factor in causing conflicts between 1956 and 1973, it is essential to recognize the broader historical context and the multitude of actors and complexities involved in shaping the events in the Middle East during this period. The conflicts were the result of a combination of territorial disputes, nationalist aspirations, superpower rivalries, and regional dynamics, all of which contributed to the ongoing tensions in the region.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
O LEVEL
NOTES
- How important was Israeli aggression as a cause of conflict, 1956–73?
Explain your answer.
YES
- An armed Israel took advantage of the situation in 1956;
- Secret plan to invade Egypt across Sinai to claim land;
- Paratroopers used; continued to rearm and modernize thanks to US, French, and British help;
- Israeli pre-emptive strike against Egypt in 1967 Six Day War;
- Israeli air force gained air superiority, etc.
NO
- More important – roles of Britain and France in 1956;
- Nasser in 1956 and 1967; creation of PLO;
- PLO raids into Israel; superpower involvement;
- 1973 – Sadat’s surprise attack across the Suez Canal;
- Syria and Baath Party; Arab nationalism, etc.