Urban Living Conditions and Industrialization Impact
TITLE
Explain why living conditions in cities and towns were bad for the lower classes as a result of industrialisation.
ESSAY
During the period of industrialization, the living conditions in cities and towns were extremely poor for the lower classes. This was primarily due to rapid and unplanned urbanization, the prevailing laissez-faire attitude of the government, overcrowding in low-quality housing, insanitary conditions, pollution, and the blame placed on the lower classes themselves.
One of the main reasons for the poor living conditions was the rapid and unplanned urbanization that occurred during this time. As people were attracted to cities and towns for work in factories, mills, and mines, the population in these areas grew exponentially. However, there was no proper planning or regulation in place to accommodate this influx of people. As a result, housing became overcrowded and of low quality, leading to cramped living conditions for the lower classes.
Furthermore, the prevailing laissez-faire attitude of the government exacerbated the situation. The government did not see it as their responsibility to regulate housing, sewage, and water supply. This meant that there were no standards or regulations in place to ensure that the living conditions in cities and towns were adequate. It was only slowly that this attitude began to change, and the government started to take some measures to improve living conditions.
The overcrowding and insanitary conditions in cities and towns also contributed to the poor living conditions for the lower classes. With limited space and inadequate housing, diseases such as cholera, typhus, and tuberculosis spread rapidly. The lack of proper sanitation and hygiene facilities further worsened the situation, making cities and towns breeding grounds for these diseases.
In addition to these factors, pollution from the surrounding industries added to the unhealthy atmosphere of cities and towns. The industrial revolution brought about the rise of factories and mills, which emitted pollutants into the air and water. This pollution not only affected the physical health of the lower classes but also contributed to the overall degradation of the living environment.
Moreover, the middle and upper classes often blamed the lower classes themselves for the conditions they lived in. They believed that the lower classes were responsible for their own poverty and poor living conditions. This attitude hindered any attempts at improving living conditions, as the cost of any changes would be met by the ratepayers, who were predominantly from the middle and upper classes. This meant that there was little incentive for the government or local authorities to invest in improving the living conditions of the lower classes.
In conclusion, the living conditions in cities and towns were extremely bad for the lower classes as a result of industrialization. Rapid and unplanned urbanization, the laissez-faire attitude of the government, overcrowding, insanitary conditions, pollution, and the blame placed on the lower classes all contributed to this situation. It was only with the slow change in government attitudes and the introduction of some regulations that living conditions began to improve, but the effects of industrialization on the lower classes' living conditions were long-lasting.
SUBJECT
HISTORY
PAPER
AS Level
NOTES
Explain why living conditions in cities and towns were bad for the lower classes as a result of industrialisation. Indicative content Urbanisation was rapid and unplanned. The prevailing attitude of laissez-faire meant government did not see it as their job to regulate on such things as housing, sewage, and water supply. This only began to change, slowly. Urban centres grew because people were attracted to them for work in the factories, mills, and mines. This led to over-crowding in low quality housing and insanitary conditions. Cities and towns became breeding grounds for diseases such as cholera, typhus, and TB. Pollution from the surrounding industries added to the unhealthy atmosphere of cities and towns. Many amongst the middle and upper classes felt that the lower classes themselves were to blame for the conditions they lived in. The cost of any changes to living conditions would be met by ratepayers, the middle and upper classes. This hindered the efficacy of attempts at improving conditions. The Public Health Act (1848) was ‘permissive legislation’ – local authorities may adopt its provisions, but they did not need to (‘compulsive legislation’).